ADVERTISEMENT

Court fixes date for ruling of AMCON’s takeover

AMCON had earlier announced that it intends to take over Arik Air Ltd to “save it from collapse."

An Arik Air plane

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports  that AMCON had on Feb. 8 announced that it had taken over Arik Air Ltd to “save it from collapse and in the best interest of the general public, workers, creditors and others in the aviation sector.

A legal practitioner, Mr Oluseye Opasanya (SAN), was appointed as the receiver manager of Arik Air following its takeover by AMCON.

By an ex parte application on Feb. 8, AMCON secured an injunction restraining Arik’s shareholders, directors, creditors, managers, officers, employees, servants, and privies, from interfering with Opasanya’s power to manage the airline.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, four persons — Sir Joseph Arumemi-Ikhide, Chris Ndule, Dr. Michael Arumemi-Ikhide and Engr. Sangowawa Olubiyi — had filed a preliminary objection against the court’s order.

Their preliminary objection was filed through their lawyer, Mr Babajide Koku (SAN).

They accused the lawyer representing AMCON and Opasanya, Prof. Kayinsola Ajayi (SAN), of engaging in “professional misconduct” and urged the court to void all the processes so far filed on behalf of AMCON and Opasanya.

The grounds of their objection was that Ajayi and Opasanya are both lawyers practising in the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi LP.

Koku argued that by virtue of Rule 17 of Professional Conduct of Legal Practitioners 2007, neither Ajayi nor any other lawyer from the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi LP could appear in a case where Opasanya is a plaintiff.Opposing the preliminary objection, Ajayi argued that there was a distinction between Opasanya and the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi where Opasanya works, adding that no law stops anyone from representing Opasanya.Besides, Ajayi also filed a preliminary objection challenging the locus standi of the plaintiffs to file the preliminary objection.

ADVERTISEMENT

He argued that they were not parties in the suit in question which AMCON and Opasanya filed against Arik and the Inspector-General of Police, describing them as interlopers, who should not be heard.

He, therefore, urged the court to dismiss their preliminary objection.

After hearing both preliminary objections on Friday, Justice Mohammed Idris, adjourned until May 15 for ruling.

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng

Recommended articles

Banks will soon start deducting cybersecurity levies on your electronic transactions

Banks will soon start deducting cybersecurity levies on your electronic transactions

Faulty aircraft prevents Shettima from representing Tinubu at US summit

Faulty aircraft prevents Shettima from representing Tinubu at US summit

84-yr-old Olubadan-designate vows to build on his predecessor's legacies

84-yr-old Olubadan-designate vows to build on his predecessor's legacies

Tinubu, Shettima out of the country  —  who is in charge of Nigeria?

Tinubu, Shettima out of the country  —  who is in charge of Nigeria?

Why I rejected NUJ award Alia accepted - Agbese

Why I rejected NUJ award Alia accepted - Agbese

Intrigue as Kano Senator donates 1 million clay pots, burial materials to constituents

Intrigue as Kano Senator donates 1 million clay pots, burial materials to constituents

Delta, Nigeria’s highest oil & gas producer laments epileptic power supply

Delta, Nigeria’s highest oil & gas producer laments epileptic power supply

Telegram powered crypto casino, TG.Casino, signs partnership with AC Milan

Telegram powered crypto casino, TG.Casino, signs partnership with AC Milan

Measles kills 42 children in Adamawa, Govt extends resumption date to May 13

Measles kills 42 children in Adamawa, Govt extends resumption date to May 13

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT