Advertisement

Was Croatia's Equalizer Rightly Disallowed? Pedro Henriques' Analysis of Portugal vs. Croatia

The match was positively marked by VAR interventions, penalty decisions, offside calls, and the ball's sensor, which resolved the tie
Advertisement

5' Bruno Fernandes' shot did not, at any point, hit Josip Sutalo's hand or arm. The ball struck the Croatian player's legs. Everything was legal; there was no reason for a penalty.

Advertisement

17' Rúben Dias was completely reckless in his challenge for the ball. He raised and extended his left arm, striking Ante Budimir in the neck/face with his elbow, for which he was rightly shown a yellow card.

POSITIVE
The VAR's intervention on the penalty awarded to Portugal, and the video assistant referee and ball technology (sensor) on two disallowed Croatia goals.

53' Everything was legal. In the build-up to Croatia's goal, Josip Stanisic was in an onside position on the right flank at the moment Nikola Vlasic passed the ball. Therefore, there was no offside infringement.

56' Offside. Croatia's goal was correctly disallowed by the assistant referee and quickly confirmed by VAR. In the build-up, Nikola Vlasic was clearly ahead of the second-to-last defender when Petar Sucic passed him the ball.

Advertisement

61' Offside. Cristiano Ronaldo's goal was correctly disallowed as he was ahead of the second-to-last defender, who was Josip Sutalo at the time, when Pedro Neto made the pass. The assistant referee immediately flagged for offside, and VAR confirmed the correct decision made on the field.

65' Penalty correctly awarded. Without contesting the ball, and using both hands, Nikola Vlasic clearly and obviously grabbed and pulled Renato Veiga, preventing the Portuguese defender from reaching the ball. VAR was right to call the referee to the monitor. Given it was a clear hold, a yellow card should also have been shown.

80' Goal correctly disallowed by VAR, as Petar Sucic was in an offside position relative to the second-to-last defender, Nuno Mendes, at the moment the ball was passed to him. Once again, technology superseded the assistant and ensured sporting fairness.

NEGATIVE
The management of added time: the referee gave 10 extra minutes, but it made no sense for the game to end 19 minutes after the 90.

90' The referee awarded 10 minutes of added time due to the following incidents: two goals validated, two goals disallowed with VAR checks for offside, one yellow card, three stoppages for substitutions involving six players, and a hydration break lasting three minutes and two seconds. The amount of time added was correct.

Advertisement

90'+8 Yellow card correctly shown to Perisic, who, off the ball, approached Rúben Dias and pushed the Portuguese center-back. The unsporting behavior was rightly sanctioned disciplinarily.

90'+13 A player is in an offside position if any part of their head, body, or feet that can score a goal is nearer to the opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-to-last opponent. The fact that the ball hit Renato Veiga is considered a deflection, not a deliberate play by an opponent, which would have validated Josko Gvardiol's position.

The doubt was whether Igor Matanovic had headed the ball, as that's when the moment of the pass counts. The images might not be conclusive, but the technology is infallible and showed that there was indeed a touch. This involves an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), positioned and stabilized precisely at the geometric center of the ball. It instantly detects speed, trajectory, and, crucially for this play, the exact moment the ball is touched.

Furthermore, it's important to remember that advanced semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) is being used, powered by Artificial Intelligence, 3D player avatars, and a smart ball with integrated sensors. Each stadium is equipped with 16 high-speed cameras installed on the roof. These cameras track the ball and monitor 29 body data points for each player, 50 times per second, ensuring no human error in offside evaluations. Croatia's goal was correctly disallowed.

Referee Espen Eskas' rating: 7

Advertisement
Loading discussion…

Signing in with Google...