Advertisement

The (False) Controversy Surrounding Aryna Sabalenka's Roland Garros Outfit

When Russian Oksana Selekhmeteva, world number 88, stepped onto the clay courts of the Paris Grand Slam dressed identically to the world number 1, fans were outraged. However, there's an explanation for them wearing the same dress to the same party.
Advertisement

Russian tennis player Oksana Selekhmeteva, ranked 88th in the world, caused a stir when she appeared on court in the same outfit Nike had designed specifically for Aryna Sabalenka. This sparked outrage among fans who believed the dress was exclusive to the world number one.

Advertisement

The outfit in question, a jumpsuit with a black mesh overlay, was inspired by the concept of a “Clay Court Ballet,” according to Nike. Sabalenka had showcased it weeks earlier on Instagram, following a public request she made to the brand to elevate the standard of her custom gear, a trend that began at this year's Australian Open.

Despite fan incredulity, the situation is not controversial. Nike had made the outfit available for purchase before the tournament, a commercial strategy to capitalize on generated interest. With a narrow two-week sales window and no guarantees about a player's longevity in the draw, early sales maximize business opportunities.

A source familiar with Sabalenka's relationship with Nike stated that most athletes want to see their gear sold. “Most players would love to have their gear sold at retail,” the source said, adding, “And she wants fans to copy what she wears — that's the goal of sports marketing.”

This strategy allows fans to buy and wear the outfits during tournaments, generating organic marketing for the brand, as was previously seen with Sabalenka's surf-inspired outfit during the Australian Open.

Advertisement

It's worth noting that this isn't the first time a special Nike outfit has been debuted by another player. In 2008, before the Australian Open, Daniela Hantuchova wore the dress Maria Sharapova planned to wear at the Grand Slam during the Medibank International. Sharapova ultimately opted for a white version, but from that point on, her outfits were only released for sale after she had worn them on court.

Nike's approach to tennis apparel has changed significantly, especially after the departure of creative director Gino Fisanotti in 2021. Fisanotti, now at Moncler, was known for advocating expensive custom kits for stars like Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova, a philosophy that culturally defined Nike Tennis but was costly to maintain.

Contrary to fan indignation, Aryna Sabalenka was reportedly unfazed by Selekhmeteva wearing her outfit. On the contrary, the tennis player and her team are said to be pleased with the commercial success of the dress, which sold out almost completely days before the tournament's end, validating Nike's merchandising strategy.

It's important to note that other athletes' contracts, such as Naomi Osaka's, contain different clauses. Osaka has custom outfits guaranteed by contract and her own collection that generates royalties. Her outfit for Paris, for example, will not be sold at retail, reflecting the exclusivity of her agreement with the brand.

Aryna Sabalenka's team is reportedly pushing Nike to adjust her sponsorship contract to reflect her ranking and growing fan base. Currently, the tennis player's agreement does not include the same exclusivity clauses that benefit other top athletes, such as Naomi Osaka.

Advertisement

However, according to several sources, Nike does not intend to approve another contract in the same vein as Osaka's. The company's approach to tennis apparel has changed significantly, especially after Fisanotti's departure. Creating truly custom outfits is a time-consuming, expensive process, and often difficult to adapt to a competitive price for the mass market.

An agent who has worked with the sports brand explained the economic reality of the sector. “Tennis is such a niche that nobody makes much money just from tennis apparel,” he stated. “You can make money from a signature shoe model, but everything else is peanuts. So, it's more profitable for a brand to create a casual wear line for a player's collection.”

Ultimately, custom outfits are not a direct revenue source but rather a marketing tool. They serve to position players under a certain image — be it modern, bold, or classic — and to generate anticipation around their appearances in tournaments. The excitement surrounding the unveiling of a new Osaka outfit is a clear example of this phenomenon.

This is also why the fan reaction was so intense when Oksana Selekhmeteva was seen wearing the same dress as Sabalenka. Tennis outfits are no longer seen merely as performance wear but have become part of the players' mythology. Even with Nike adopting a more pragmatic stance on the economic viability of custom apparel, moments like this demonstrate the cultural power these outfits still hold.

Advertisement
Loading discussion…

Signing in with Google...