Advertisement

'I'd buzz-cut them all and send them to the circus!' Zoran Čutura opens up to Sportal on modern players, Novosel's visionary era, Obradović, and 74-year-old Šakota's drive: 'What are you doing? You've had heart surgery!' /VIDEO/

A former European champion with Cibona, world and continental gold medallist with Yugoslavia, and later one of the sharpest pens in regional sports journalism, Zoran Čutura has never been an ordinary interviewee. He proved it once again in a candid talk with Sportal, slipping comfortably into the role of an unassuming 'mental and administrative retiree' sporting a Miles Davis graphic tee.
Advertisement

In the historic setting of Old Town Ulcinj, a place steeped in 2,500 years of history, slipping back into the vibrant basketball scene of the 1980s felt effortless.

Advertisement

The Friendship World Cup, held for the fifth time in Ulcinj, offered attendees a rare treat: waking up to the inspiration of local artists, heading over to the "Venecija" terrace, and sharing a coffee with basketball legends like Zoran Čutura and Teoman Alibegović. For sports journalists, being in Ulcinj felt like a kid in a candy shop—a rare opportunity to mingle, conduct interviews, and reminisce with the stars who shaped an era and defined multiple generations of former Yugoslav sports.

During the action-packed three-day event, every minute counted. Following a minor schedule reshuffle, Čutura spoke first to Sportal, with Teoman Alibegović's interview set to follow in the coming days.

Without further ado, here is the conversation with Čutura, who attended the gathering alongside his wife, former national volleyball player Gordana Gojnić-Čutura.

Speaking from the self-proclaimed vantage point of a "mental and administrative retiree," Čutura pulled no punches. With his trademark dry wit, he addressed the decline of regional basketball, shared fond memories of Mirko Novosel's visionary Cibona side and his time under Duda Ivković, and explained why modern NBA "showtime" frustrates him, why he'd "give every modern player a buzz cut," and what he thinks of the enduring coaching drive of Dragan Šakota and Željko Obradović.

Advertisement

We're here in Ulcinj, where new friendships are forged and old ones rekindled—where people reunite after ten, twenty, or thirty years, sometimes even longer. What are your impressions of this gathering?

This is my second time here. I had such a wonderful time last year that when the invitation came again, I gladly accepted. It's a privilege to be part of an initiative rooted in sports, friendship, and camaraderie—things that are always genuinely positive. We've all somewhat lost sight of these values in everyday life, yet you find them in abundance right here.

Were there any sports figures you hadn't seen in a very long time, making the reunion particularly emotional?

It's not just people I hadn't seen in a long time; some of them I had never met in person before, and I've always been fascinated by them. These are members of older generations. I just shared a few words with Dražen "Frfa" Mužinić, the legendary Hajduk Split player. Last night, we spent time with Igor Milanović, whom I've known from way back, though we rarely had the chance to cross paths. Then there's Ivo Daneu, who won gold at the 1970 World Cup in Ljubljana back when I was still just a kid playing in the dirt. He and his peers paved the way for all of us who came later. The calibre of people gathered here is truly extraordinary. I honestly don't know what other word to use.

The tribute to Praja (Dalipagić) was quite moving. Is there another anecdote you could share beyond what was mentioned on stage?

Advertisement
Judging by the crowd's reaction, you'd think I was speaking Norwegian, Icelandic, and Japanese all at once. Then I said, 'Thank you, Praja,' and received a polite round of applause. It was a great story, perhaps just told at the wrong time and place, so I won't rehash it. But that's the thing—these anecdotes are part commedia dell'arte and part deeply personal memories involving people who are still among us or whose legacies remain very fresh. Allow me to keep those private for now.

Looking back at Praja's career and his induction into the Hall of Fame, it feels like you'd be hard-pressed to find a humbler, more unassuming great in basketball history.

Our playing careers overlapped briefly. I think it was Peter Vilfan who once said that Praja could have played in the NBA even back then. Athletically, he was way ahead of his time—much like Michael Jordan later on in the NBA. He'd leap, everyone else would drop back down, and he'd just hang in the air, bank it off the glass, and score. That move across the Atlantic never happened, but he remains a towering figure with an astonishing list of accolades, crowned by his Hall of Fame induction—the pinnacle of recognition for any basketball player.

Speaking with you means talking to both an elite former player and a distinctive journalistic voice...

Hold on—right now, you're talking to a retiree. Keep that in mind, not just from a formal or administrative standpoint, but mentally as well.
Advertisement

I've read many of your columns, and I recall an interview where you said you enjoyed ruffling feathers. Do you still feel that way, given your sharp wit?

Not quite in those terms—let me rephrase. I was always frustrated by mainstream clichés. What's traditionally expected of an athlete? Someone who spends most of their youth chasing a ball is usually expected to say: 'May the better team win,' 'The ball is round,' 'We'll give 110 percent,' or 'We're facing a tough opponent.' That kind of talk drove me crazy. I'd like to think I never uttered those phrases in my life—I can't swear to it, but I certainly tried not to. That mindset carried over into my sports writing, steering clear of standard templates. Let's be honest, sports reporting can get monotonous. In a match report, someone always wins, someone always loses, fans cheer, and the referees do their job, well or poorly. By the time you cover all that, your column inches are gone. I always tried to weave in social commentary and pop-culture references. Whether I succeeded or not is another story. Perhaps I should have started this answer by saying: thank you for reading, and thank you for the kind words.

The pleasure is ours. One of your pieces that stood out was a tribute to Dragan Šakota, an elite tactician who sometimes flies under the radar despite his immense contributions. He's a revered figure in Greece and is still actively coaching.

Yes, his drive and ability to stay at the top level are remarkable. Coaches are a unique breed. You see veterans step away, only to return to the sidelines. My initial thought is often, 'What on earth are you doing? You've provided for three generations, you've achieved everything, you've had heart surgery!' But then it hits you—they thrive on adrenaline. They live for that final-second free throw. Whether it goes in or not doesn't even matter; it's all about that rush. 'Šale'—Mr. Šakota—is someone I worked with closely as both player and coach, and we hit it off on a human level. We're still in touch to this day. Not constantly, but we check in periodically. If this reaches him: all the best to you and your family, Šale! As for me, I'm the exact opposite when it comes to adrenaline. I've had more than enough to last a lifetime—please, spare me any more. I never had the urge to coach; that's entirely another world to me.

Speaking of adrenaline, what was that intensity like during Cibona's back-to-back European title runs?

Advertisement
You have to realise you're asking about something that happened forty years ago—that's two whole generations. But how did it feel? We were at our absolute best when the training session right before a game was on the verge of a full-blown brawl. That fiery tension, nerves, and raw adrenaline would channel directly into competitive drive on matchday. That's how we'd put together disciplined, high-octane performances against elite opposition. That was the recipe.

For someone like me, born in 1989 and too young to have watched that league live, it's fascinating to look back on...

You're younger than both of my kids!

When I visited Zadar to interview Petar Popović at the historic Jazine hall, I tried to picture the atmosphere back then. It truly puts into perspective how formidable the Yugoslav league was when even a peak Cibona could miss out on the domestic title...

It was a phenomenal league, without question. To quote the late former president of the Croatian Basketball Federation, Danko Radić—we used to fight like cat and dog in our official roles, but we genuinely enjoyed our conversations because there was always substance to them. Danko once pointed out: 'Yugoslavia was a country of 20 million people with a single top flight.' For simplicity's sake, say ten clubs, a hundred top players, ten head coaches, ten presidents. After the breakup, you suddenly have seven separate national leagues, all branded as elite 'A' divisions. Overnight, those ten clubs became seventy clubs, seventy coaches, and seven hundred players—that's the dilution of quality in a nutshell. Add to that the transition to a free-market economy, and players in their prime who once starred domestically are now playing in the NBA, Spain, or Italy. It's night and day. People make a mistake trying to draw direct comparisons between those eras. A clear line separates them, and trying to equate the two simply doesn't work. It's apples and oranges.
Advertisement

What is your take on the current generation of European players dominating the NBA?

Just yesterday, during a casual chat with Dino Rađa—who has an incredible resume, including his NBA career—we were talking about Jokić and Dončić, as they naturally come up in any modern basketball conversation. Dino spoke very highly of them. Across the table, I asked him: 'How do you think they would have fared in the 1980s?' That's the era I'm most attached to. That was when I first started closely following the game—the legendary Celtics-Lakers rivalry, Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, and then Jordan. So I asked: 'How would they hold up against the Bad Boys Detroit Pistons, where every game bordered on a physical altercation? How would Jokić deal with Bill Laimbeer, the most hated player in NBA history?' I don't pretend to have the definitive answer, but it's worth pondering before launching into uncritical praise of anyone.

A few years ago, you mentioned that you now only follow basketball on a casual, informational basis.

Very selectively, yes. Don't get me wrong—basketball is a magnificent game, and I still love it. It's a sport where an athlete must make split-second decisions at the highest level while constantly interacting with teammates, opponents, coaches, referees, and even the crowd. But after decades of playing and covering it, I'm very particular about what I watch. I'll gladly tune in for the NBA Conference Finals and Finals, or the knockout stages of the EuroBasket, World Cup, and Olympics. But the buildup? I just don't have the patience anymore. If I spot ten fundamental tactical and technical blunders by players and three questionable coaching calls within the opening ten minutes, I have to switch it off. I simply can't watch it. Please bear with me on that.

When it comes to the Croatian national team, is that still a sore subject?

Advertisement
Depends on the question. Go ahead, and we can always edit if I veer off track.

Looking back at the Olympic clash between Serbia and Croatia, it was a nail-biter that Serbia edged in the end. It's been nearly a decade since then. Croatia has consistently produced elite talent, yet converting that into major tournament silverware has remained elusive.

There were some truly brilliant generations. Croatia's last major medal came in 1995 at the European Championship in Greece under Aco Petrović. In my columns, I often referred to everything that followed as the 'curse of walking off the podium.' We don't need to rehash that now, but there was an abundance of talent—Roko Ukić, Marko Tomas, Ante Tomić, Nikola Vujčić, Gordan Giriček, Marko Popović... What was missing? I can't say for sure, but I had the misfortune of witnessing firsthand how our team seemed to invent entirely novel, unprecedented ways to drop quarter-final games at major tournaments. Looking ahead, after years of struggles, they've finally qualified for a major event under a new head coach and a revamped squad. The World Cup format has evolved, but it's heading to Qatar, and we'll see how things unfold.

What are your thoughts on Tomislav Mijatović? He is widely regarded as one of the finest gentlemen in the sport.

First and foremost, he is a wonderful human being, at least from everything I know of him. He built an outstanding reputation on the biggest stage, primarily as an assistant coach, and this is truly his first real opportunity to prove himself as the head man. He spent years as the trusted assistant at Anadolu Efes, stepping in as interim coach during transitions. Now he has his shot. So far, the signs are very encouraging, and I sincerely hope he continues on this upward trajectory.
Advertisement

Reflecting on your international playing days, could you share with our younger readers what coming through the ranks was like in the late 1980s?

It's tough to capture everything in a single conversation, but I can share my own path. In my generation, I'd bet anything that nobody picked up basketball for the money. That's the first and biggest difference compared to today. Secondly, I was born, raised, fell in love, started a family, and went to school entirely in Zagreb. I hit my growth spurt early in primary school. Back then, coaches regularly visited schools to scout youth tournaments—school sports actually meant something, unlike today in Zagreb and Croatia. A coach spotted a tall, lanky kid and asked if I'd like to join a club. That was Industrija Montaža, which later changed its name and is now Zrinjevac. That's how it started. I'd take the tram from the far eastern edge of the city all the way to the western terminus, gym bag in hand. I attended regular school classes, packed a sandwich, and headed back out for evening training. It was a natural progression. I honestly don't know what youth development looks like now—whether it's driven by parents, agents, whether kids stay in school or not... I can only speak to my own experience. That was our upbringing.

It feels fitting to touch upon Mirko Novosel. What are your thoughts on his legacy, and does basketball still owe him greater recognition?

His place in history is secure—after all, he is enshrined in both the FIBA and Naismith Basketball Halls of Fame. When I joined Cibona—right after completing my mandatory military service—Mirko was a true tactical pioneer. He was among the first in Europe to adopt concepts from American basketball. Up until 1985, when Cibona won its first European Champions Cup, his tactical ideas were sharp, even revolutionary. Take the matchup zone, for instance: he picked that up from the Americans, who were always open and generous with their coaching philosophies. Mirko implemented that matchup zone, and it drove our title success. However, as modern coaching know-how evolved rapidly across the continent, Mirko and Cibona somewhat plateaued, and powerhouse sides like Partizan and Jugoplastika soon caught up and overtook us.

When you think of the late Dušan 'Duda' Ivković, what stands out most?

Advertisement
Duda was arguably the finest coach I ever played for. I didn't have many different coaches throughout my career—I dislike the word 'career,' but there's no better alternative. Duda was undoubtedly the best of his time. He possessed the perfect blend of tactical mastery, vast experience, and natural authority. Even though I didn't play a starring role in that national team, he always treated me with immense respect, which was entirely mutual. I will cherish his memory forever.

On the club side, do you keep tabs on the EuroLeague, Red Star, Partizan, and current storylines?

Selectively. With Mr. Obradović—with whom I shared time in the national team as a player, and later crossed paths with on numerous occasions both professionally and casually as a journalist—returning to take charge of one of Europe's premier clubs after a break, I find it intriguing to follow his journey there. In all honesty, that's what catches my eye.

Broadly speaking, what do you make of the current direction of the sport across the NBA and EuroLeague?

Pure chaos. Absolute chaos. For a casual viewer—and I'm becoming increasingly detached myself—it's terribly difficult to make sense of it all. Now there's talk of an NBA Europe tournament in Manchester, and you just have to wonder... It's all drifting toward pure entertainment. It reminds me of the early 1980s: NBA coverage in socialist Yugoslavia was limited to brief newspaper snippets with virtually no video. Yugoslav clubs would tour the US playing collegiate teams, which was part of Mirko's forward-thinking approach to learn from the best. On one of those trips, we went to Madison Square Garden for an NBA game. It was a complete culture shock. The arena was half-empty, an organist was noodling in the background, and disinterested fans half-heartedly chanted 'defence, defence.' Players were just jogging up and down the floor, while spectators did everything except watch the game—munching on hot dogs, chatting, grabbing drinks. It took me ages to understand how the world's premier league operated. It was early in the regular season, teams were easing in, and for the fans, it was simply an evening out with a budget in mind. For someone raised on winning at all costs, it was bewildering. Today, it feels like modern basketball as a whole is heading down that exact path.
Advertisement

Does it seem strange to you how much player dynamics have shifted—where athletes are coddled, and some publicly complain when a coach like Željko raises his voice, as seen in recent comments around Duane Washington?

It's hard for me to relate. First off, I'd give every modern player a buzz cut. I'd outlaw waist-length braids and Mickey Mouse hairstyles entirely. If you want to put on a show like that, go join the circus. I have no interest in watching that. Call me rigid, old-fashioned, or whatever you like, but it genuinely annoys me.

Has the sheer volume of games contributed to viewer fatigue?

Without a doubt. With today's broadcast packages, you can easily watch seven games a day. But nobody can actually digest seven games. It's the equivalent of banging your head against a wall for five hours straight—the end result is the same.

In the past, there was one marquee game a week. If Real Madrid came to Belgrade, the entire week was spent anticipating it. Now, double-round weeks are the norm.

I remember when Yugoslav league rounds were played on Saturday afternoons at 5 PM. Each week featured a broadcast from a different city—Rijeka, Zadar, and so on. I'd watch at my grandmother's house, where a lace doily covered part of the TV screen, blocking a chunk of the picture. I still recall those days fondly. In terms of accessibility and anticipation, that era was arguably far better than today's endless overproduction.

You mentioned being born, falling in love, and raising a family in Zagreb. What is everyday life like within a sporting household?

That era is behind us now. Living in a capital city like Zagreb is all about curating your life—taking what suits you and filtering out the rest. You keep your tight circle of friends, enjoy your comfort zone, go to the cinema, theatre, or catch live music... which I still do regularly despite my age. In fact, the day after returning home, I'm heading to see Partibrejkers in concert, probably for the fifteenth time. I feel right at home here. This is my city, and I'm proud to be part of its sporting fabric.

VIDEO: Dino Rađa moved to tears after his documentary, remembering Duda Ivković: 'Too many people from that era are no longer with us'

Advertisement
Loading discussion…

Signing in with Google...