Clear Talk on Uproar Over Referee Danny Makkelie for Morocco World Cup Match: 'When Will People Understand?'

The appointment of Makkelie for the match between Morocco and Haiti immediately sparked significant reactions. The reason is simple: the Netherlands and Morocco could potentially face each other later in the tournament in the Round of 32. Should the Dutch team finish first in their group and Morocco second (or vice versa), a direct confrontation awaits.

According to former top referee Van der Ende, there's a too-quick tendency to doubt the integrity of officials. "My first thought was that Makkelie hadn't exactly been assigned the most high-stakes match. Haiti is already eliminated, so the focus will primarily be on the number of goals Morocco scores. Yet, I saw all sorts of terms like conspiracy, intrigue, and premeditated play being thrown around. I wonder when people will understand that you have to assume the neutrality of referees."

Listen to the Sportnieuws.nl World Cup podcast.

Van der Ende, who officiated over six hundred matches in Dutch professional football, recognizes this discussion from his own career. According to him, a referee's nationality says nothing about their independence. "It's not even certain that the Netherlands and Morocco will meet. And besides: Makkelie might be Dutch, but why should that matter? That never hindered me as a referee. I was always there for myself."

The former top official cites examples from his own experiences. "At the tournaments in 1994, 1996, and 1998, I had to go home as soon as the Netherlands reached the last eight. I voiced my opinion about that at the time, because I actually found it ridiculous. As a referee, you're also there to deliver a top performance yourself. I am Dutch, but I wasn't a supporter of the Dutch national team. You should expect a top referee to be completely neutral."

Van der Ende therefore doesn't believe Makkelie would deliberately do anything to give the Netherlands an advantage later on. "I assume Makkelie simply wants to officiate a good match so he can progress further in this tournament himself. As a referee, you're not going to make questionable decisions if it jeopardizes your own World Cup, are you?" he asks aloud.

However, the former referee believes that FIFA itself is partly responsible for the ensuing discussion. According to him, the appointment policy actually fosters additional distrust. "Look at Michael Oliver, for example. He doesn't just get assigned a match involving a top European nation. Then you get the Netherlands against Sweden, two countries from the same continent. By doing this, FIFA itself feeds the idea that referees might not be neutral."

According to Van der Ende, quality should always be the guiding principle for appointments. "Just watch: as soon as we reach the semi-finals and the final, that entire policy is suddenly abandoned. While neutrality shouldn't even be a discussion. I always use the example of the Olympic ice hockey final between Canada and the United States. There were simply three Canadian referees on the ice. Why? Because they were simply the best. Quality should always be the most important criterion."

• The latest news about the FIFA World Cup in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

• Check the schedule here, including fixtures, results, and standings.

• Find everything about the Dutch national team here, from news and remarkable stories to statistics.

• Watch and listen to our daily World Cup podcast.

• If you don't want to miss anything, download our Sportnieuws.nl App.