Advertisement

Sexist Comment Towards Umpire Leads to Record Roland Garros Fine

Paraguayan Daniel Vallejo to pay €65,000 after claiming his lost match against Frenchman Moise Kouame should have been umpired by a man
Advertisement

Paraguayan tennis player Adolfo Daniel Vallejo has been hit with the largest fine in Roland Garros history, a staggering €65,000, after making sexist remarks directed at Brazilian umpire Ana Carvalho.

Advertisement

The incident unfolded after Vallejo's defeat to Frenchman Moise Kouame, in a match decided by a fifth-set tie-break. Dissatisfied with the officiating, the world No. 71 complained about his opponent's time-taking between points and asserted that the match should have been officiated by a man, accusing Ana Carvalho of failing to manage the pressure from the French crowd.

"This type of match should be umpired by a man. It's very difficult for a woman to do it. It should be umpired by a man because it's a very demanding crowd, you need a lot of strength to face the public," the Paraguayan stated, later apologizing for his comments. 

In tennis, players are allotted 25 seconds to serve, but umpires have the discretion to start the time count judiciously, especially in situations with significant crowd noise.

The sanction, which amounts to roughly half of the €130,000 prize money the athlete earned for reaching the second round of the Parisian Grand Slam, was confirmed by the tournament organizers. Roland Garros director, former tennis player Amélie Mauresmo, deemed the statements unacceptable and elaborated on the decision.

Advertisement

"It was decided to apply a fine of €65,000, more or less half of his prize money. Clearly, this is something that, for us, is not acceptable, neither for the tournament, nor for the [French] federation, nor even beyond the tournament. This type of comment is inappropriate," Mauresmo declared.

Advertisement
Loading discussion…

Signing in with Google...