Advertisement

2023: IPOB, Amotekun may spark post-election violence - US institutes warn

___6941130___https:______static.pulse.com.gh___webservice___escenic___binary___6941130___2017___7___4___14___2007+Post+Election+Violence
___6941130___https:______static.pulse.com.gh___webservice___escenic___binary___6941130___2017___7___4___14___2007+Post+Election+Violence
The institutes also said that banditry and terrorist activities in certain parts of the country may undermine logistics and strain the capacity to secure elections.
Advertisement

As the 2023 general elections draw ever closer, an international delegation of two United States-based institutes has expressed concern over the activities of separatist groups and informal security outfits in the South-East and South-West which may trigger post-election violence.

Advertisement

The organisations which issued the alert were National Democratic Institute (NDI) and International Republican Institute (IRI).

The NDI and IRI specifically noted that, while the ongoing secessionist agitation by the  Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) may lead to a low turnout of voters, the proliferation of regional security elements, including Amotekun in the South-West and Ebube Agu in the South-East would increase opportunities for election violence.

The delegation of the two organisations made this known while presenting its second joint pre-elections assessment statement to journalists in Abuja on Friday, December 9, 2022.

The assessment conducted between December 4 to 9, 2022 was built on the first assessment mission which visited Nigeria in July 2022.

Advertisement

The delegation included Senior Fellow for Africa Policy Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, Ambassador Michelle Gavin; Commissioner at the Electoral Commission of South Africa, Judge Dhaya Pillay; Programmes Director of the Zimbabwe Election Support Network, Ellen Dingani; IRI Director for Africa, Gregory Kearns and NDI Deputy Director for Central and West Africa, Dr. Sophia Moestrup.

The U.S.-based institutes observed that a major concern affecting most parts of the country is insecurity driven by extremist and sectarian violence, banditry, the rise of separatist elements, and the proliferation of informal security forces.

In addition to attacks by various violent armed groups, election-related violence in Nigeria has increased significantly over the past years, the delegation also noted.

According to the organisations, Nigeria has experienced more than twice the level of election violence in 2022, compared to the same period prior to the 2019 elections.

They noted that despite most presidential candidates signing the first peace accord facilitated by the National Peace Committee there have been at least 50 reported incidents of electoral violence, occurring across 40 local government areas in 24 states.

Advertisement

The report reads: The delegation notes consensus among stakeholders that insecurity is the primary risk factor for the 2023 elections. Nigeria is facing record levels of insecurity in 2022 and conflict has become more geographically widespread and more complex.

“Increasing banditry and attacks by Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province in the North East and North West threaten to undermine logistics and strain capacity to secure elections. The continuing conflict between herder militias and farming communities drives displacement and exacerbates sectarian tensions in states that are likely to be key electoral battlegrounds.

“Secessionist agitation by IPOB)/Eastern Security Network in the South East threatens to depress voter turnout. If the election is perceived to be illegitimate, the group could gain significant traction, and potentially become directly involved in post-election violence.

“The proliferation of informal security elements – such as Amotekun in the South West and Ebube Agu in the South East – further complicates security and increases opportunities for election violence and malfeasance.

While commending the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the introduction of the bimodal voter automated system (BVAS), the institutes warned that, “if there were to be widespread malfunction of the BVAS machines as occurred with the smart card readers in 2015, it could undermine the perceived legitimacy of the elections and spark violence.

Advertisement

While acknowledging the progress the country has made in bringing young people into the voter register, the organisations noted that there are still significant barriers for young people and other traditionally marginalised groups to participate in the electoral process as candidates.

According to them, the overall percentage of women running for elections has declined from 13 percent in 2019 to 8.9 percent in 2023, a development the institutes described as a disappointment for Africa’s largest democracy.

While urging the INEC to clarify how underage voters, double registrations and any other criteria that would result in a voter being removed from the voter roll will be handled, they called on the commission to conduct national stress tests of the BVAS machines and the IReV system to ensure they are prepared to function effectively on election day across more than 176, 000 polling units.

The report added:INEC should complete surveys of internally displaced persons camps in all states, and provide clear guidelines on the process by which IDPs, including those not living in IDP camps, will vote in the election.

“Candidates and political parties should adhere to the principles in the peace pledges facilitated by the National Peace Committee ahead of the elections, and refrain from engaging in or encouraging violence against electoral opponents. Political parties should also sign a second peace pledge to renew their commitment to peaceful elections and to sanction supporters who commit electoral offenses.

“All presidential candidates should commit publicly to accept results of credible elections while grievances arising before, during, and after the elections should be channeled through the appropriate legal process.

“Security forces should proactively identify wards at high risk of strategic election violence and focus their resources on these areas.”

Advertisement