FG says El-Zakzaky exhibited acts of misconducts that necessitated his repatriation.
'El-Zakzaky sought asylum in India', FG explains why IMN leader was repatriated
Recommended articles
Following reports about Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakzaky’s return to Nigeria three days after his medical trip to India, the Federal Government has explained the reason for the repatriation of the Shiites leader.
The government in a statement on Friday, August 16, 2019, said the leader of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) demonstrated malicious intents that were capable of embarrassing the governments of Nigeria and India.
The government also accused El-Zakzaky of seeking asylum in India instead of the medical treatment for which he was granted permission to travel to India by a Kaduna High Court.
The statement issued in Abuja by the Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Information and Culture, Grace Isu Gekpe stated that the cleric contacted some Non-Governmental Organisations in India to seek asylum and relocate to another country.
The statement entitled: “The repatriation of Ibraheem El-Zakzaky from India” reads: “The Federal Government wishes to inform the public about the latest development in the Ibraheem El-zakzaky medical trip controversies to India. The government notes with dismay the acts of misconduct exhibited by El-Zakzaky that necessitated his repatriation.
“The earlier statement of August 14, 2019, by the government addressed the issues that would have raised some questions with the latest occurrences and particularly the uncelebrated return of El-Zakzaky from India.
“The public may note that El-Zakzaky’s actions in India demonstrated malicious intents that were capable of embarrassing the governments of Nigeria and India. With total disrespect and complete loss of decorum for international procedures while in India, he initiated contacts with a team of lawyers led by Ali Zia Kabir Chaudary and Gunjan Singh in that country.
“He also contacted some Non-Governmental Organisations, such as the Islamic Human Rights Commission and other Shiite groups. His aim was to seek asylum and eventually relocate to another country. It is important to note that if an Indian court had granted El-Zakzaky asylum or leave to travel to another country, it would have violated the Nigerian court order that granted him permission to travel for medical treatment.
“However, he used the opportunity of being in India to attempt to internationalise his cause by mobilising the Rights groups. Even most unfortunate and rather embarrassing as earlier stated, was his quest to be relocated to a 5-Star hotel to receive visitors instead of being admitted in the hospital as a sick person he claimed to be.
“In spite of his misconduct, El-Zakzaky’s spouse went further to antagonize the Indian and Nigerian security agents and accused the latter of killing her children. These acts were aimed at winning international sympathy as well as disparaging the Nigerian government.
“Having subordinated the quest for medical treatment to other ulterior motives, it became obvious that El-Zakzaky was focused on realising some sinister motives, thus the decision to return him to Nigeria.”
Meanwhile, the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN), on Friday, August 16, 2019, confirmed the return of its leader, Sheikh Ibraheem El-Zakzaky, to Nigeria, but rejected reports that he refused treatment in India.
In a statement by its Media Forum, IMN said that the religious leader arrived in Abuja at noon.
JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!
Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:
Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng