Advertisement

Brady's explanation made no sense

___4760046___https:______static.pulse.com.gh___webservice___escenic___binary___4760046___2016___3___4___5___tombrady-1015-getty-us-ftr_1vc2ritohp4fk1kqqum7twyszh_1
___4760046___https:______static.pulse.com.gh___webservice___escenic___binary___4760046___2016___3___4___5___tombrady-1015-getty-us-ftr_1vc2ritohp4fk1kqqum7twyszh_1
Two of the three judges presiding over the NFL's appeal of the ongoing Deflategate case may be siding with the league.
Advertisement

One of the judge's in the NFL's appeal of the Deflategate case claims some of Tom Brady's evidence "made no sense whatsoever".

Advertisement

The NFL appealed Judge Richard Berman's ruling last August that vacated a four-game suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Brady.

The league maintains that Brady knowingly used under-inflated footballs during last year's AFC championship game that sent the Patriots to Super Bowl XLIX.

Judge Denny Chin said on Thursday that "the evidence of ball tampering is compelling if not overwhelming," according to the Boston Globe.

Brady also stood accused of destroying a mobile phone to get rid of texts that implicated him in a scheme to deflate footballs below the league's required air pressure.

Advertisement

Brady said he always destroys phones when he gets a new one for security purposes. That explanation did not sit well with Judge Barrington Parker.

"Mr. Brady's explanation of that made no sense whatsoever," Parker told the court.

The judges' scrutiny reportedly exasperated NFL Players Association attorney Jeffrey Kessler, who is representing Brady in the case. The three-judge panel was also critical of the NFL's handling of the case and a ruling might not come for several months.

Advertisement
Latest Videos
Advertisement