Advertisement
CHAOS DIGEST

Mladen Krstajic would be Nigeria's worst-ever coach - Part 2

Mladen Krstajic (IMAGO / NurPhoto)
Mladen Krstajic (IMAGO / NurPhoto)
If reports linking the 47-year-old to the Nigeria role are true, the judgment of Nigeria's football administrators should seriously be called into question.
Advertisement

This is the second of a two-part series assessing the suitability of Serbian Mladen Krstajic for the role of Super Eagles coach. The first part can be read here.

Advertisement

________________________________________________________________________________________________

First, with just four months to go till the World Cup, Krstajic stripped Branislav Ivanovic of the national team captaincy, and handed it to Aleksandar Kolarov, with Nemanja Matic deputizing. While Ivanovic, at 34, was no longer the player he once was, such a drastic move for minimal gain made little sense.

Then, when the squad list for the World Cup was announced, there was further intrigue with the absences of Mijat Gacinovic and stalwart defender Matija Nastasic. The former, on the back of a strong season in the Bundesliga with Eintracht Frankfurt, was passed over for the less impressive Andrija Zivkovic and Nemanja Radonjic; the latter, ostensibly dropped due to an injury sustained in a 3-2 Bundesliga defeat to Hamburg with former club Schalke, would later allege that, contrary to Krstajic’s claims, he never received any direct communication or explanation for the decision, and would not play for the national team anymore as long as Krstajic was in charge. 

“It is a dream for every player to perform at the World Cup,” Nastasic said. “They didn't even tell me why I was crossed out, the injury is not the reason. What disappointed me the most was that he didn't even call me. I’m not saying goodbye to the national team forever, I will just not play while Krstajic is the selector.”

Advertisement
Defender Matija Nastasic, then at Schalke, said he would never again play for Serbia under Krstajic (IMAGO / RHR-Foto)
Defender Matija Nastasic, then at Schalke, said he would never again play for Serbia under Krstajic (IMAGO / RHR-Foto)

That latter sentiment would prove a popular refrain, as midfielder Luka Milivojevic arrived at the same decision months after the World Cup.

However, let us not skip too far ahead.

At the World Cup, Serbia finished third in Group E, behind Brazil and Switzerland. However, their defeat to the latter provided some of the most controversial moments (with allegations made against referee Felix Brych and the subsequent fine meted out to Switzerland for the political celebrations of Granit Xhaka and Xherdan Shaqiri) of the competition, and exposed Krstajic’s lack of tactical acumen. 

His decision to go for the win in the final 10 minutes despite holding all the aces with the score at 1-1, and to do so by substituting a holding midfielder, left Serbia wide open and handed the initiative to the Swiss, who were only too happy to oblige. The image of Shaqiri running the length of the Serbian half unimpeded to score in the 90th minute was scarcely believable, and that decision ultimately doomed the Serbs. 

Advertisement
Serbian fans were left heartbroken following a last-minute defeat to Switzerland at the 2018 World Cup (IMAGO / Sven Simon)
Serbian fans were left heartbroken following a last-minute defeat to Switzerland at the 2018 World Cup (IMAGO / Sven Simon)

“I think we should have been more experienced and played for a result in the last 15 minutes [against Switzerland], we tried to take risks where in my opinion we did not have to,” Milivojevic said afterward. He was promptly dropped for the final group match against Brazil, which Serbia unsurprisingly lost.

Krstajic remained in the post, however, for another year until an infamous 5-0 away defeat to Ukraine sealed his fate. Along the way, there were more fallings out and even greater acrimony: left-back Ivan Obradovic refused a call-up in March 2019, telling Alo, “I simply do not want to play for the national team while Mladen Krstajic is the selector. That is my final decision,”; in the same month, Nikola Maksimovic was left out on account of injury, despite playing for Napoli just before the international window.

In all, Krstajic’s win-draw-loss record over 19 matches was largely positive. However, five of his nine wins were accounted for by China, Lithuania and Bolivia. By the time he was relieved of the role, everyone in Serbia was only too happy to see him gone.

Learning from history

Advertisement

The parallels should, at this point, be all too apparent.

Nigeria has a former Bordeaux manager in state, and are set to (officially, at least) sack him for playing uninspiring football, without having a clear succession plan. It is into the exact same situation wherein Krstajic so luridly failed four years ago that the NFF are looking to thrust him.

Gernot Rohr enjoyed modest success managing Zinedine Zidane at Bordeaux
There are a number of similarities, starting from a 90s spell at Bordeaux, between Gernot Rohr and Slavoljub Muslin

There is broader administrative common ground as well: speaking with the now-defunct football website ‘In Bed With Maradona’ in 2011, (current Serbia manager) Stojkovic said, “There is no feeling of responsibility and no professional mindset. People don’t do their jobs; they want to do something different. They don’t know how to do it, but they put their noses in the wrong place. The president of the FA doesn’t qualify for the World Cup – the players qualify for the World Cup. They want to put themselves on the front page.”

Sounds familiar, does it not?

Advertisement

The decision to appoint Krstajic set Serbian football back, wasting a talented group of young talents with poor tactical decisions, petty beef, dishonesty and gaslighting. His unwillingness to communicate the rationale behind his decisions to players also alienated a number of the more experienced cadre, and calls into question his man management.

Samuel Chukwueze. Victor Osimhen and Chidozie Awaziem (Twitter/Super Eagles)
Nigeria has too much young talent coming through to entrust its future to Krstajic (Twitter/Super Eagles)

While it is possible that the 47-year-old has been humbled by the experience and is better for it, it is also unlikely: since his sacking, he has had one other job, and his stint there lasted nine months.

To turn an already precarious situation over to a man given to such volatility would be an unfortunate own-goal. Even worse, it would be such an easily avoidable one, and is so transparently a bad idea that one wonders if self-sabotage is not the aim here.

The object here is not to argue, of course, that sacking Rohr is a bad idea in itself. For all that the parallels with Muslin are strong, the Serbian had been in charge for just over a year; his German counterpart has been incumbent for five years, and so has less of an excuse for not improving the team’s playing style. However, to get rid of Rohr at this time, only to install Krstajic, would be egregious in the extreme.

Advertisement

Then again, few things define Nigeria more than rewarding and willfully rehabilitating historic failure.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

You can subscribe to the Chaos Digest newsletter to receive future posts directly via email.

Advertisement