Israeli lawmakers in 'marathon' debate on coalition deal

Pulse News Agency International by AFP

May 5, 2020 12:28 PM

Israel's parliament on Tuesday launched what it warned would be a "marathon debate" on a proposed coalition government deal, the legality of which has been challenged in the country's Supreme Court.

A proposed coalition deal between veteran Israeli Prime Minister Benhamin Netanyahu and his erswhile rival Benny Gantz has sparked a spate of protests in recent days and could yet be torpedoed by parliament or the Supreme Court

A statement on parliament's website said the bill to pass into law the contentious accord between incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his rival-turned-partner Benny Gantz faced about 1,000 requests for amendments from its opponents.

The 120-member parliament, which is fiercely divided on the issue, is scheduled to debate until around midnight (2100 GMT), resuming early Wednesday.

Voting is currently scheduled to begin at 4 pm (1300 GMT) on Wednesday and to last several hours, but a parliament spokesman said that timetable could change.

Former Gantz ally Yair Lapid, head of the opposition Yesh Atid party, is among the eight petitioners to the Supreme Court seeking to block the deal, while Gantz's Blue and White party defended it in the two-day hearing which ended Monday.

If the agreement is torpedoed by the court or parliament, it is expected to send Israel into a fourth general election, after three inconclusive polls in a year.

Netanyahu warned Monday evening that judicial intervention would "go against the will of the people" as expressed in the most recent election on April 9 in which his right-wing Likud party beat the centrist Blue and White by 36 seats to 33.

"I was elected by majority vote," he said.

The panel of 11 judges is expected to rule by Thursday, the deadline for forming a government under electoral law.

At Monday's hearing, justices raised concern with several aspects of the coalition deal, but were reluctant to rule on the legality of individual provisions before they had become law.

In a written opinion to the court, Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit had advised that problematic provisions be reviewed "at the implementation stage".

During three elections in a year Gantz had based his campaign on ousting Netanyahu and what he called his corrupt regime.

Netanyahu is indicted with accepting improper gifts and illegally trading favours in exchange for positive media coverage.

He denies wrongdoing and his trial is set to start on May 24.

Speaking in Tuesday's televised debate, Lapid accused Gantz of abandoning his principles and betraying those who voted for him by agreeing to share power with his erstwhile foe.

"If, three months ago I had told you from this podium that Gantz would battle in court for Netanyahu's right to hold office with three grave charges (against him), you would have told me I had lost my mind," he said.

The three-year agreement would see Netanyahu serving as prime minister for 18 months, with Gantz as his "alternate", a new title in Israeli governance.

They will swap roles midway before likely taking voters back to the polls in 36 months.

scw/bs/kir

1 slide

Israel's Supreme Court said on Monday that it would wait for parliament to pass the coalition into law before ruling on the legality of its provisions POOL

Pulse News Agency International by AFP