ADVERTISEMENT

INEC, APC seek dismissal of SDP's petition against Governor Ododo's victory

The tribunal, after listening to all the parties in the petition, reserved the matter for judgment.

INEC, APC seek dismissal of SDP's petition against Kogi Governor's victory [Punch Newspaper]

Gov. Ododo and his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), have also told the three-member panel of Justices, headed by Justice Ado Birnin-Kudu, to dismiss the petition in its entirety for being incompetent and lacking in merit.

The trio, through their lawyers – Chief Kanu Agabi, Joseph Daudu and Emmanuel Ukala – stated this position while adopting their final written addresses and presenting their arguments against SDP and Ajaka’s petition.

However, Ajaka’s lawyer, Pius Akubo, has urged the tribunal to discount the respondents’ submissions and uphold their petition. The tribunal, after listening to all the parties in the petition, reserved the matter for judgment.

ADVERTISEMENT

It would be recalled that Ajaka had challenged Ododo’s victory in the November 11, 2023 Kogi governorship poll. In the petition, INEC, Ododo and APC are listed as 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents respectively.

The tribunal had, on April 25, fixed Monday for the adoption of final written addresses after the parties closed their case in the matter. Upon resumed hearing, INEC’s counsel, Agabi told the court that their final written address was dated and filed on May 2.

He said the commission’s reply on point of law was dated May 8 and filed May 9. While adopting the processes, the lawyer submitted that the petition lacked merit and was incompetent, urging the court to strike it out or dismiss it.

“It is our humble submission that your work in the determination of this petition is simplified in recent judgments by the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court,” he said.

He argued that the Appeal Court had decided that if the grounds of a petition are inconsistent with one another, and are not consistent with the reliefs, it should be struck out.

ADVERTISEMENT

He also argued that the evidence of the petitioners was grossly insufficient, citing a Supreme Court decision in a case by Tonye Cole against INEC.

“It is to the effect that once the evidence called is grossly insufficient, there is no evidence.

“In that case, the petitioner filed 305 witness depositions but only adopted 40 of them.

“The petitioner, according to the decision, only adopted about 13.1% of the witness depositions.

“In this case, the depositions adopted represent just about 3.6% of their witness depositions,” he stated.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said the petitioners only called 25 witnesses out of the scores listed. Agabi said that in a mathematical calculation of evidence, 3.6% of Ajaka’s witness deposition adopted in the petition amounted to a failure and, therefore, ought to be dismissed.

The lawyer also described the case as “frivolous”. He said the petitioners equally failed to file the witness deposition beforehand in contravention of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obungado’s case.

He argued that the petitioners’ witness, who testified about the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines clearly stated that he could not guarantee whether those were the BVAS used.

Besides, he said the witness was not the maker of the inputs in the BVAS machines.

“Also, the evidence contained in the BVAS machines fell short of what is required of the law,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Agabi further argued that the BVAS machine was tendered against Section 84 of the Evidence Act, as there was no certificate of trustworthiness attached alongside it as required by the law.

He argued that out of the 25 witnesses called by the petitioners, there was no single polling unit agent among them.

“In other words, not a single person who observed the election was called.

“Besides, the star witness could not distinguish between what he heard and what he saw when questions were put to him,” he noted.

The senior lawyer prayed the tribunal to strike out or dismiss the petition for being incompetent. While adopting his final written address dated and filed on May 1, Daudu, who appeared for Gov. Ododo, urged the tribunal to dismiss the petition in its entirety.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adumbrating, he argued that the petition was statute-barred (filed out of time). The senior lawyer said that though the petitioners responded to their submission that “when it comes to filing, it is what the secretary of the tribunal says that determines the date of filing,” he, however, argued that the action of the petitioners was against Section 122(1) and (2)(a) of the Evidence Act, which empowers the tribunal to take judicial notice of this.

But Akubo objected to Daudu’s citing of the section, describing it as a fresh argument. Daudu, in response, disagreed with Akubo that he was raising fresh issues after a final written address had been filed.

“You cannot shut me out from making my comment. You cannot because you don’t have the power to do so,” he said.

He said if the court found merit in his argument, Akubo had the right to respond because it bordered on issues of remittal procedure. He also urged the tribunal to dismiss the allegations of forgery against his client, saying it bordered on a pre-election matter, which the apex court had decided in Gbagi’s case against INEC.

Daudu also argued that Section 137 of the Electoral Act cited by the petitioners on allegations of over-voting did not apply in the instant petition. Also backing Daudu’s submission, Ukala, who represented APC, urged the court to dismiss the petition for lacking in merit.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lawyer, who said their final written address, dated April 30 was filed same date, adopted all the processes. The petitioners’ lawyer, Akubo, told the tribunal that their final written address was dated and filed on May 6.

He disagreed with Daudu that their petition was filed out of time. He argued that the respondents themselves confirmed that the petition was filed on December 2, 2023, even by their witness.

“I urge your lordship to hold that we filed this petition within time under our law,” he added.

After taking the arguments, Justice Birnin-Kudu reserved judgment on the petition.

“The date will be communicated to both parties,” he noted.

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng

Recommended articles

Nigeria collapsed the day Tinubu removed petrol subsidy - Babachir Lawal

Nigeria collapsed the day Tinubu removed petrol subsidy - Babachir Lawal

Nigeria will not import one drop of petrol by June - Dangote

Nigeria will not import one drop of petrol by June - Dangote

Why I will support Peter Obi to be president in 2027 - Atiku

Why I will support Peter Obi to be president in 2027 - Atiku

APC didn't pay my school fees, I won't advise them, suspended Jimoh Ibrahim

APC didn't pay my school fees, I won't advise them, suspended Jimoh Ibrahim

No worker can survive on less than ₦100,000 minimum wage - Shehu Sani

No worker can survive on less than ₦100,000 minimum wage - Shehu Sani

NBA identifies challenges hindering administration of justice

NBA identifies challenges hindering administration of justice

Rivers’ political wrangling may hurt investors’ confidence – Group warns

Rivers’ political wrangling may hurt investors’ confidence – Group warns

Obi yet to brief Labour Party about his meetings with Atiku, Saraki

Obi yet to brief Labour Party about his meetings with Atiku, Saraki

How millions of Nigerians across 100 communities got humanitarian aid in 8 years

How millions of Nigerians across 100 communities got humanitarian aid in 8 years

Pulse Sports

'I want to be beautiful' - Sha’Carri Richardson on why she keeps long nails

Osimhen: PSG set for life after Mbappe with 200 BILLION NAIRA move for Super Eagles star

Osimhen: PSG set for life after Mbappe with 200 BILLION NAIRA move for Super Eagles star

Osimhen’s Champions League dream dies as Juventus and Bologna seal European qualification ahead of Napoli

Osimhen’s Champions League dream dies as Juventus and Bologna seal European qualification ahead of Napoli

Arteta’s Arsenal surpass Wenger's ‘Invincibles’ to break 20-year old Gunners’ record

Arteta’s Arsenal surpass Wenger's ‘Invincibles’ to break 20-year old Gunners’ record

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT