Buhari’s aide says IPOB leader’s sureties might be arrested
Obono-obla said that the sureties might face the wrath of the law if Kanu does not appear in court for his next case.
Obono-obla also said that the sureties might face the wrath of the law if Kanu does not appear in court for his next case.
The IPOB leader is expected to appear at the Federal High court in Abuja on October 17, 2017, Vanguard reports.
Kanu was granted bail Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday, April 25, 2017, with the following conditions:
1. He must produce three sureties, including a highly respected and recognised Jewish leader.
2. He must also produce a highly placed person of Igbo extraction such as a Senator.
3. The IPOB leader must also produce a highly respected person who is resident and owns landed property in Abuja.
4. He must not attend any rally or protest.
5. He must sign an undertaken to make himself available for trial at all times.
6. The IPOB leader was also ordered to surrender his Nigerian and British international passports to the Nigerian authorities.
The IPOB leader however satisfied the requirements of his bail application on Friday, April 28, 2017.
The three sureties who signed his bail bond are: Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, Jewish High Chief Priest, Immanuu-El Shalom Okabemadu and a Chartered Accountant resident in Abuja, Tochukwu Uchendu as demanded by the court.
Speaking further, the presidential aide said “The Federal Government has already filed a motion to set aside Kanu’s bail.
“Following the military exercise carried out in Umuahia, Abia State and the subsequent proscription of IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu has not been seen and may have gone underground.
“So it is not likely that he will appear in court on the next adjourned day for fear of being arrested by the police or security agencies. Kanu had sureties that entered into recognizance or signed bail bonds as ordered by the court that led to his release.
“What is a recognizance? In law, recognizance is a security entered into before a court with a condition to perform some act required by law; on failure to perform that act a sum is forfeited.
“The position of the law as provided under Section 173 (1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, is that a defendant whom recognizance was entered on his behalf and who is subsequently released on bail is bound to appear before the court at every time and place to which during the course of the proceedings, the hearing may from time to time be adjourned.
“The court also may issue a warrant of arrest where a defendant (Kanu) bound by a recognizance or bond fails to appear before a court or police station. It follows that if Kanu fails to appear before the Federal High Court on the next adjourned date, the Judge will likely order a warrant for his arrest.
“The implication of the failure of Kanu to appear in court on the next adjourned date on those who stood sureties for his recognizance is that his recognizance shall be forfeited.
“The court shall order his bond entered by his sureties to pay the penalty or to show sufficient cause why the penalty should not be paid.
“It follows that Kanu’s three sureties will be ordered to pay N100 million each. Where sufficient cause is not shown by the sureties or the persons bound and the penalty is not paid, the court may recover the penalty from the person bound or from his estate if he is dead, in the manner laid down in the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 for the recovery of fine
“However, where the penalty is not paid and cannot be recovered in the manner laid down by the law, the person bound shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months.”
Meanwhile, following Nnamdi Kanu’s sudden disappearance, IPOB recently alleged that the Army might have killed their leader.
The Federal Government had earlier asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to revoke Nnamdi Kanu's bail.
JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!
Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or: