Man writes open letter to Apostle Paul claiming he doesn't understand the New Testament

Apostle Paul one of the earliest converts into Christianity was the author of 13 books including the book of Romans which are classified into the new testament

Apostle Paul

A Christian blogger, Peter Enns, penned an open letter to Apostle Paul in the bible, saying he needs more insight into the biblical books he had written.

Apostle Paul one of the earliest converts into Christianity was the author of 13 books including the book of Romans which are classified into the new testament.

In the open letter, the writer asks Apostle Paul to clear his confusion especially in the book of Romans as there seem to be something missing in his epistles, hence the confusion.

Read his letter below:

Dear Paul,

First of all, thank you for writing so much of the New Testament.

Thank you for also teaching inerrancy, not only of the Bible you have (the Old Testament) but of your own letters and those other parts of the New Testament that hadn’t even been written yet!

The actual reason for my letter is to ask you to clear up some confusion for me. I’m reading through Romans, and I see that you quote the Old Testament on pretty much every page.

[Which, by the way, is another thing I appreciate that about your work: you show that the entire Bible is exactly on the same page, that the Old Testament writers were already writing about the coming of Jesus. And you quote chapter and verse to prove it.]

But, getting to my question–and if this is a minor point or I’m missing something, please feel free to ignore–I’m having some trouble with a few places where you quote the Old Testament.

Now, I know you believe, as we all do, that the Bible, being God’s word, is perfectly consistent all the way through, meaning it doesn’t mean one thing in the Old Testament and another thing when you quote it. You respect the Bible and the intention of the original author more than anyone, and you’d never mistreat the Bible like that.

But I’m reading along, a little more than halfway through (we call it Romans 9:25-26), where you are making your point about how God has called a people not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles.

Then you quote from Hosea 2:23 and 1:10 to show that this whole business of including the Gentiles was on God’s mind all along.

Those who are not my people I will call “my people,” and her who was not beloved I will call “beloved.”

And in the very place where it was said to them, “you are not my people,” there they shall be called children of the living God.

It looks like you’re saying “those who are not my people…not beloved” are the Gentiles who are now included because of Jesus. I’m happy for Gentile inclusion, being one myself, but I went back and read Hosea and I’m confused.

It seems pretty clear to me that the original meaning and intention of Hosea is that God is restoring disobedient Israel after a period of rejection and punishment. I’m not seeing anything there at all about Gentiles, and so I’m not sure why you would say “here are two verses about Gentile inclusion.”

I have some Christian friends who think that, because you’re Jewish, you might actually be engaging in a little creative Jewish midrash here, but I’ve told them that you would never play fast and loose with scripture! You understand that the very doctrine of inerrancy that you teach–maybe even the gospel that you preach–hangs in the balance.

I think you see my confusion, though.

So I’m asking you to help me defend you better. Perhaps point me to other places in your letters where you don’t do this sort of thing, which would really help in balance things out.

Or maybe slowly and clearly explain how your use of Hosea’s words is aligned with what God actually intended, and why it’s OK for God to intend something Hosea doesn’t when it’s not OK for us to do that.

I have to say, too, this lingering uneasy feeling has been growing since I began of Romans. Please help me see better what I know you’re actually doing.


Your Fellow Soldier

P.S. If you have some time, could you also clear up why you’re not a strong supporter of the “eternal covenant” of circumcision God gave Abraham and why all of a sudden the list of clean and unclean foods God gave Moses on Mt. Sinai is optional. Only if you have time.


Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:


Recommended articles

9-year-old allegedly identified as person who set Ebeano supermarket on fire

President Buhari jets off to London to see his doctors

Van Vicker finally graduates from university after 24 years

Lady seen setting Ebeano supermarket on fire in Abuja

BBNaija 2021: All you need to know about the 22 housemates

Nigeria’s basketball team lose their opening game at Tokyo Olympic Games

Tonto Dikeh returns to Nollywood in new Tchidi Chikere directed movie

Badagry Slave Route: Slaves passed these 5 notable stops on their journey of no return

Burna Boy, Davido, Ed Sheeran, Coldplay, Doja Cat, others announced for Global Citizen Live event