ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

'Absolutely no legal authority': Trump's threats to shut down Twitter are 'totally asinine' and reek of censorship, according to legal experts

President Donald Trump threatened to "strongly regulate" or entirely shut down social media companies shortly after Twitter fact-checked two of his tweets pushing conspiracies about mail-in voting.

FILE- In this March 23, 2020 file photo, President Donald Trump talks during a briefing about the coronavirus in the James Brady Briefing Room, Monday, March 23, 2020, in Washington, as Attorney General William Barr looks on. Legislation to extend surveillance authorities that the FBI sees as vital in fighting terrorism was thrown in doubt Wednesday as President Donald Trump, the Justice Department and congressional Republicans all came out in opposition. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
  • But legal experts told Business Insider the president has "absolutely no legal authority" to carry out his threats and described Trump's efforts as "empty virtue-signaling to his base."
  • "It's very clear that what he is really doing is trying to bully Twitter into continuing to allow him to broadcast whatever he wants to, however false it is, with complete impunity," Drexel University law professor Hannah Bloch-Wehba told Business Insider.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories .

President Donald Trump struck a forceful tone this week when he threatened to "strongly regulate" or entirely shut down social media companies for what he perceives as an anti-conservative bias.

But legal experts say he has "absolutely no legal authority" to carry out his threats.

The president's early-morning tantrum was catalyzed by Twitter's decision on Tuesday to add fact-checking links to two of his tweets alleging voting by mail in California would be "substantially fraudulent" and lead to a "Rigged Election."

ADVERTISEMENT

Twitter's alert the first of its kind on the site linked to a "Moments" page titled, "Trump makes unsubstantiated claim that mail-in ballots will lead to voter fraud" and listed a series of facts contradicting his claims.

Soon after, Trump accused the social media platform of " interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election " and said he wouldn't allow Twitter to stifle free speech.

"Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices," Trump tweeted on Wednesday morning. "We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen."

The president said his administration will take "big action" against the tech company.

Ken White, a First Amendment law and criminal defense attorney at Brown White & Osborn (and also a blogger at the popular legal site, Popehat ), told Business Insider that Trump's tweets are "empty virtue-signaling to his base."

ADVERTISEMENT

"The government has no power to close down social media, and social media programs have both statutory and First Amendment rights to moderate and comment as they see fit," he said.

Notably, a federal court last year found that the president himself violated the First Amendment by blocking Twitter users and thus depriving them of participating in a public forum.

It's not the first time the Trump administration has threatened legal action against social media companies who make decisions the president disagrees with. Last year, the White House drafted a proposal to regulate social media platforms to fight purported bias against conservatives.

The proposal asked the Federal Communications Commission to create new regulations about how social media companies are allowed to moderate speech on their platforms. It also called for the Federal Trade Commission to keep a public list of complaints from users who believe their rights have been violated by online moderation.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gives social media companies broad authority to moderate speech.

And although members of Congress have threatened legislation on the issue for years, the threats seem "more like culture war posturing than substance," White said.

Hannah Bloch-Wehba, a law professor at Drexel University who specializes in civil liberties and cyber issues, called Trump's threats against Twitter "totally asinine."

"They completely lack any kind of legal foundation whatsoever and it's very clear that what he is really doing is trying to bully Twitter into continuing to allow him to broadcast whatever he wants to, however false it is, with complete impunity," she told Business Insider.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clay Calvert, a law professor at the University of Florida and director of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project, told Business Insider that Trump has no legal authority under his executive branch powers to unilaterally shut down a social media platform "simply because he disagrees with its policies for how it treats and now fact-checks his tweets."

"We have the First Amendment to protect the speech of private entities Twitter being one of them and individuals from government censorship, whether the censorship emanates from the legislative, executive, or judicial branch," Calvert added.

Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia, told Business Insider in an earlier interview that Trump's threats are "mostly bluster" and that he's unlikely to be able to follow through on them.

The president could issue executive orders, try to push federal agencies to regulate Twitter, or ask Congress to pass legislation on the matter, "but none will be fast or help him before November," Tobias said.

There is also no legal precedent that would give Trump the power to shutter a social media platform for fact-checking his claims, which companies are completely within their rights to do.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kate Ruane, the senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Business Insider that governments have in the past tried to intervene in content moderation decisions by private companies.

But those efforts have typically resulted in "debacles that undermine online privacy, safety, and speech," Ruane said, like the EARN It Act , which has been criticized for infringing on users' rights to free speech and online security.

Moreover, Trump's threats on the issue "consistently misapprehend the very real online censorship problem, ignoring the reality that black activists, sex workers, and the LGBTQ community are the ones who are often disproportionately silenced by online platforms," she added.

Many First Amendment experts are concerned about the broader implications of Trump's crusade against the media and fact-checking. Bloch-Wehba said she worries the president's efforts are "destabilizing people's faith that what they are learning is true and unsettling the entire foundation of our democratic system."

"This isn't China, where the government censors the social media as it sees fit and at will," Calvert said. "But it seems Trump wants to move the United States in that direction."

ADVERTISEMENT

See Also:

SEE ALSO: White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, who has promoted conspiracy theories about mail-in voting fraud, voted by mail 11 times over the last 10 years

Enhance Your Pulse News Experience!

Get rewards worth up to $20 when selected to participate in our exclusive focus group. Your input will help us to make informed decisions that align with your needs and preferences.

I've got feedback!

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT