A huge question looms over Trump after the CIA reportedly concludes the Saudi crown prince ordered Jamal Khashoggi's killing

The White House is in a bind following the CIA's reported assessment that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the kingdom's consulate in Turkey last month.

But the CIA's finding, which was made in high confidence and first reported by The Washington Post, represents the most definitive US assessment to date directly linking Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler to Khashoggi's murder.

In light of that, Trump is faced with a critical question: will he accept his own intelligence agency's assessment or Saudi Arabia's?

CIA director Gina Haspel traveled to Turkey late last month to address the investigation into Khashoggi's death. She met with Trump when she returned to the US a few days later, and national-security experts said it was highly unlikely she didn't fill him in on what the agency had determined.

On Saturday morning, Trump told reporters he had not yet been briefed on the matter.

Ned Price, the former senior director of the National Security Council under President Barack Obama, told INSIDER the odds that the CIA had high confidence in its assessment and yet did not brief Trump right away "are virtually nil."

"

Later Saturday, the White House said Haspel and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo briefed Trump on the CIA's assessment while he was en route to California. In an interview that aired on Fox News Sunday, Trump also said his administration "

The CIA has also reportedly briefed Congress, which signaled that it will seek to punish Saudi Arabia for its actions. As of Sunday, Trump had not publicly commented on whether he trusted the CIA's findings.

The Saudis have bought the man

Robert Deitz, the former general counsel at the National Security Agency, said the president's silence was par for the course.

"When Trump is in a bind, he tends to temporize, and I think that's what's going on here," Deitz told INSIDER. "The bind is this: Saudi Arabia is the mother of all arms buyers. They're also a very important Middle East ally. So how can the US hold [Crown Prince Mohammed] and Khashoggi's killers accountable while also preserving the alliance? Because it's very challenging for the US to simply dump Saudi Arabia."

After saying he hadn't been briefed on the Khashoggi investigation Saturday morning, Trump touted the US's economic ties to Saudi Arabia, calling the country a "great ally."

"They give us a lot of jobs ... a lot of business, a lot of economic development," he said.

While Saudi Arabia is an important economic partner, fact-checkers have pointed out that the president often overstates the value of the alliance by inflating the number of American jobs Saudi arms sales would create and how much it would help the US economy.

Trump and his advisers have also stressed the strategic advantages of a US-Saudi alliance, particularly when it comes to containing Iran. But Middle East experts say that with or without a partnership with the US, Saudi Arabia would still push back against its neighbor because of roiling tensions between the two countries that go back years.

Glenn Carle, a former CIA covert operative, offered a blunt assessment of Trump's response — or lack thereof — to the Khashoggi investigation.

"The main pillar of this administration when it comes to the Middle East is that the president wants to make nice with [Crown Prince Mohammed] and Saudi Arabia because he likes dictators and because the Saudis have bought the man," Carle told INSIDER.

Trump said last month that he has "no financial interests in Saudi Arabia." But during his presidential campaign, he boasted about making "hundreds of millions" of dollars from Saudi customers and said he would maintain close ties with the kingdom because it invested in his properties.

Ultimately, Carle said, Trump will likely "pay lip service to how killing is bad," but will go back to business as usual by supporting the crown prince and Saudi Arabia.

Randa Slim, the director of conflict resolution at the Middle East Institute, echoed that view.

From the onset of the Khashoggi case, she told INSIDER, Trump made clear that "maintaining a close relationship with the de-facto ruler of Saudi Arabia will trump the need for justice and accountability" for Khashoggi's murder.

He doesnt care if its an ally or an adversary; its all about what supports his own personal interests

If Trump were to continue trusting Crown Prince Mohammed over the CIA after being briefed on the matter, it would be reminiscent of his response to Russian President Vladimir Putin after the US intelligence community concluded with high confidence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to elevate Trump to the presidency.

When Trump flew to Helsinki for a high-stakes meeting with Putin over the summer, he shocked observers when he said at a press conference that he trusted Putin's denial of Russian interference over US intelligence findings.

"The president has shown time and again that he will only agree or praise or take note of something that supports his particular perspective, and everything else he will either ignore or denigrate," Carle said. "Thus, his approach to the Saudis will be the same as his approach to Russia. He doesn't care if it's an ally or an adversary; it's all about what supports his own personal interests and beliefs."

Trump, who has a long history of business ties to Russia, often praises Putin and says it's important for the US to get closer to Russia so the two countries can cooperate on matters of mutual interest, like counterterrorism.

He has faced resistance, however, from Congress and his own administration, which continues approving sanctions and other countermeasures against Russia even as Trump calls for a cozier relationship with Moscow.

The looming quagmire with Saudi Arabia is similar, but with one key difference.

"The CIA concluded with high confidence that [Crown Prince Mohammed] ordered the assassination of a US resident," Slim said. "While Putin stands behind many of his critics' assassinations, no intelligence agency, let alone the CIA, has publicly stated he ordered the killings himself."