Legal experts had expected the SCA to issue a new ruling on whether Zuma can challenge the charges
Zuma is appealing a ruling by the High Court in April ordering a review of a National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) decision to set aside hundreds of corruption charges against Zuma. That decision allowed him to run for president in 2009.
Legal experts had expected the SCA to issue a new ruling on whether Zuma can challenge the charges but instead said the president's lawyers should first argue their case in court. The court did not set a date for the appeal hearing.
The NPA's own attempt to appeal that ruling was denied by the Constitutional Court last week.
The hundreds of corruption charges relate to a major government arms deal arranged in the late 1990s.
The main opposition Democratic Alliance party said in a statement that the appeals court decision to hear arguments in court rather than issue a ruling was unusual and gave Zuma another delay from having his day in court.
"President Zuma will one day have his day in court, and we are one step closer to that today," the party said.
The prospect of Zuma's corruption charges being reinstated follows a constitutional court judgment against him in March. The court said he breached the constitution by refusing to refund some of the 240 million rand ($17 million) of state money spent on refurbishing his private residence.
Zuma has since repaid some of the money.